This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This article was originally published on the FCR blog on December 10, 2018. They believe that quality assurance is about coaching agents and making continuous improvement over time and that supersedes a score. Any seasoned coach has seen the look in an agent’s eye when they’re handed a quality review and they go straight to the score.
This article originally appeared on the CustomerThink blog as part of my monthly column on June 12, 2018. In a recent quality calibration with a client, we were reviewing a particular interaction where the agent had given an incorrect answer that would likely require the customer to call back. Click here to read the original.
This article was originally published on the MaestroQA blog on December 2, 2018. My rule of thumb for what else to add to a quality form is: Add to the quality form anything that you want to track so you can coach, train, and monitor improvement over time. Track agent progress and target coaching and training. Questions abound.
Effective QA programs actively engage their agents at all stages of the program, including development, roll-out, calibration and continuous improvement. If you already have a QA program, involve agents in calibration sessions and providing feedback to enhance the evaluation form periodically, but no less often than every 6 months.
This article originally appeared on the FCR blog on May 9, 2018. It’s challenging to define a quality customer service interaction but essential if you’re going to deliver any level of consistent service to customers — let alone get agents and supervisors to all understand and agree on the standard ( this is called calibration ).
Putting in the time to coach and train your team ensures you stop bad agent habits in their tracks. With so much to do, it’s tough to find the headspace, let alone the time, to think through how to coach your agents regularly. Agent scorecards are feedback tools to help you put intention behind your coaching moments. .
This includes ensuring the agents receive the proper training, quality management, and calibrations to drive high-level performance. On a weekly basis, schedule call calibration sessions to determine if the goals for call quality are in line with the execution and performance of the call center provider. 6) Average Handling Time.
The training continues with 3 weeks of on the job coaching, Quality Assurance monitoring, and regular feedback sessions with their trainers and leadership. Once completed, we provide a monthly continued education curriculum focused on areas like: providing impactful coaching. 10 Trends That Will Disrupt Customer Service in 2018.
By Nick Jiwa , President of CustomerServ ( Originally Published on March 26, 2018 at [link] ). Add to that frontline managers with on-the-phones experience who coach, counsel and mentor agents for the high-stress, often unforgiving world of outbound. The death knell for outbound telesales has sounded countless times over the years.
By Nick Jiwa , President of CustomerServ ( Originally Published on March 26, 2018 at [link] ). Add to that frontline managers with on-the-phones experience who coach, counsel and mentor agents for the high-stress, often unforgiving world of outbound. The death knell for outbound telesales has sounded countless times over the years.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 34,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content